# \[Feature Request\] Add player attributes at the ranking page

**URL:** <https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745>\
**Category:** Warcraft Logs\
**Created:** [July 10, 2017, 4:01am UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745 "2017-07-10T04:01:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![icyblade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/58f4c7/32.png) [@icyblade](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/u/icyblade)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2017, 4:01am UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745/1 "2017-07-10T04:01:26Z")

</div>

## Feature:

Add player enhancement attributes (crit, haste, mastery, versatility) at the ranking page (for example: [this page](https://www.warcraftlogs.com/rankings/13#class=Warlock&spec=Affliction)), right of the “Talents/Trinckets” column.

## Example:

![](https://cdck-file-uploads-canada1.s3.dualstack.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/flex029/uploads/combatlogforums/original/1X/cfb4a207dd36b12091001ab532142139e92ad84d.png)

## Why do we need this feature:

“Talents/Trinkets” columns is easy for us to compare DPS between different builds. Further more, what if we try to compare different attributes? Take affliction warlock for example, is mastery\>haste\>crit\>versatility always works? Is there any special attribute combinations which can deal with some specific build? These questions are valuable for, at least DPS players.

## Others:

I’m a Chinese World of Warcraft player, and I’ve participated some WarcraftLogs localization work(Dave gave me some assignments, back to 2015). I would be happy to contribute on this request if possible.

Thanks in advance!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kihra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forums.combatlogforums.com/kihra/32/1116_2.png) [@Kihra](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/u/Kihra)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2017, 12:39am UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745/2 "2017-07-11T00:39:20Z")

</div>

Main problem is I don’t have accurate attributes. Temporary buffs from pre-pull can modify the attributes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![icyblade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/58f4c7/32.png) [@icyblade](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/u/icyblade)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2017, 1:24am UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745/3 "2017-07-11T01:24:02Z")

</div>

Well, that’s a big problem I haven’t considered before. What if we just add the initial attributes, and “ignore” this problem? I wonder if this works for most of the cases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![icyblade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/58f4c7/32.png) [@icyblade](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/u/icyblade)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2017, 8:03am UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745/4 "2017-07-14T08:03:28Z")

</div>

Our team developed a userscript which enables this feature (the problem [@Kihra] mentioned above has been ignored).

## Download:

> **[icyblade/warcraftlogs\_enhancement](https://github.com/icyblade/warcraftlogs_enhancement)**
>
> warcraftlogs\_enhancement - Some Enhancement Scripts of Warcraft Logs

## Screenshot:
[![](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/icyblade/warcraftlogs_enhancement/master/example.png) ](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/icyblade/warcraftlogs_enhancement/master/example.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kihra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forums.combatlogforums.com/kihra/32/1116_2.png) [@Kihra](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/u/Kihra)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2017, 4:13pm UTC](https://forums.combatlogforums.com/t/feature-request-add-player-attributes-at-the-ranking-page/3745/5 "2017-07-14T16:13:22Z")

</div>

The problem with a script like this is that it is presumably loading all 200 reports. That’s essentially a malicious script as far as I’m concerned, since that’s going to create huge load if it were to become widespread.